Are The Fun VIVOBAREFOOT Tracker II FG Boots Effective For Hiking?
The basic features of the VIVOBAREFOOT Tracker II FG Hiking Boots are pretty familiar for a walking boot.
You get the strong leather uppers and lace-up closure that gives you good coverage around the ankle. There also seems to be enough comfort and protective features.
But, there is also an alternative look to the designs and some oddities in the specification. So, what do buyers think?
Check Price and Availability Here
The Pros and Cons of this VIVOBAREFOOT Tracker II FG Hiking Boots.
Pros:
- Strong leather uppers ending in good ankle support
- Some nice features for walking in more adverse conditions
- Three fun colour schemes to choose from
Cons:
- The sole isn’t the best around but not that bad either
- A warning that it may be difficult to put on.
The VIVOBAREFOOT Tracker II FG Hiking Boots have a great design with some interesting features for comfort and protection.
This shoe has some interesting details to the layers and materials to help users get the best possible experience while out hiking. The protection starts with the breathable lining and basic waterproofing around the foot.
But, this feature is enhanced by the use of recycled plastic in the lining. This is great for those trying to limit their impact on the environment.
Another interesting detail with the VIVOBAREFOOT walking boots here is that there is a thermal insole for a little more comfort across the year. Most wearers seem happy enough with the fit and feel of this shoe, with no major complaints about breaking them in.
Another great benefit here is that there are three fun colour choices. The botanical green is bold and unlike a lot of walking shoes.
The Obsidian could have been a smart shoe if the pale sole matched the grey in the laces. The Bracken is the most neutral as the sole doesn’t stand out too much and there are nice orange/red accents.
The specification of the VIVOBAREFOOT Tracker II isn’t particularly high-end.
One potential issue here is that some of the components aren’t that high-end compared to other shoes. For example, that recycled lining isn’t the Gore-Tex lots of walkers are after.
Also, the sole isn’t anything special as there is no thick Vibram sole for better grip and durability. It is fine but doesn’t stand out.
It may also help to be aware of comments about these shoes being difficult to put on. There is a pull loop at the back, but one user found the opening a bit tight.
Is this VIVOBAREFOOT Walking Boots still a good choice for your adventures?
The final recommendation for this shoe depends on what you want the most. If you want a shoe that has all the big-name features and most impressive specifications then it may be a disappointment.
But, the shoe is still comfortable with some quirky features. It is this alternative design and use of materials that makes this boot more interesting to walkers that want something a little more fun.
So, whichever colour you choose, the VIVOBAREFOOT walking boots should be a good fit.
Find more reviews about the VIVOBAREFOOT Tracker II FG Hiking Boots on Amazon here.
Leave a Reply