Are The Peter Storm Eskdale Walking Shoes A Practical Hybrid?
The Peter Storm Eskdale Walking Shoes look like a great blend between a more casual running shoe and a hiking boot.
It should have mass appeal if it can prove to be comfortable and protective. So what do buyers have to say?
Check Price and Availability Here
The Pros and Cons of this Peter Storm Eskdale Walking Shoes.
Pros:
- There is a more relaxed shape with the sneaker-style design
- There is plenty of comfort from the padding and support
- The sole has a nice grip
Cons:
- They aren’t as waterproof as some expected them to be.
- You might need to go a size bigger
The Peter Storm Eskdale Walking Shoes combine great features of walking shoes and sneakers for a nice hybrid.
This product starts with a sneaker style walking shoe with a low rise fit around the ankle for a more relaxed feel. Yet, there is a lot in the construction of the upper that is similar to more substantial walking boots.
There are little cut-outs running along the side of the suede with breathable mesh. The heel is also a little thicker than on a running shoe, with a little more height off the ground and more room for a good grip.
There is a StormGrip sole here that should be more than enough for walking in gravelly and slippery conditions, without being as intense as some other hiking boots.
The comfort provided by these Peter Storm walking shoes is enhanced by the lightweight feel from the midsole, the padded tongue, and general cushioning.
Many buyers are happy with the way they feel and seem to wear them on fairly long walks in the country or on coast paths. The protective ankle support here, which is also highlighted in user reviews, helps on that sort of uneven ground.
There are some misconceptions about the waterproof nature of the Peter Storm Eskdale that could prove to be problematic.
There are some interesting comments about the waterproofing of this shoe that may be a little harsh. Some mark it down as though they were misinformed. But, in one case this was because someone wore this low-rise shoe in ankle-high wet grass.
Also, while there is the word waterproof in the name on online listings, there is no mention of any membrane, such as Goretex to keep much water out. So, it is safe to say that you could get a bit wet in bad weather or puddles.
Aside from some additional comments about needing a size up sometimes, there isn’t that much to criticise about this shoe.
Is this Peter Storm Hiking Shoe still a good choice with all of this in mind?
In short, there is a lot more to like about these shoes than to dislike. If you require something 100% waterproof that you are better off with a more rugged bot up to the ankle with a better membrane.
But, this product isn’t really trying to be anything it is not. It is a hybrid shoe that has just enough of the features of a walking boot with the smaller shape and relaxed feel of a running shoe.
The Peter Storm walking shoes is more accessible to casual walkers, and therefore highly recommendable to this demographic.
Find more reviews about the Peter Storm Eskdale Walking Shoes on Amazon here.
Leave a Reply