Do The Columbia Woodburn II Hiking Shoes Last Long Enough For Hikers?
There is a growing list of hiking shoes that don’t automatically look like hiking shoes – and the Columbia Woodburn II Hiking Shoes are a great example.
This sneaker style shoe has a simple shape and low-rise design that normally goes against the idea of the rugged hiking boot.
However, there are also plenty of interesting claims about the materials used and the performance out in the countryside. So, can this deliver on these expectations as well as users hope?
Check Price and Availability Here
The Pros and Cons of this Columbia Woodburn II Hiking Shoe.
Pros:
- The design of the membrane bootie within the shoe.
- The longevity of the materials
- The light weight
Cons:
- The low-rise cut won’t suit everyone
- Some avoidable issues with the laces
The Columbia Woodburn II Waterproof Hiking Shoes are more comfortable and long-lasting than some buyers had expected.
There is a hidden element inside this walking boots that is the secret weapon when it comes to the comfort and protection on offer. There is bootie within the shoe that is an Omni-tech membrane that provides both breathability and waterproofing.
In theory, this should keep wearers a lot cooler in the summer months and dry enough in the wetter season.
Comfort also comes from the lighter weight of the leather upper, which should allow buyers to walk for longer than they may be able to in a heavier model. Finally, there is the cushioning of the midsole.
There are also some great comments from wearers about the longevity and durability of this walking shoe. It looks as though it wouldn’t last quite as long as other boots because of the design.
However, there are those still wearing it 2 years on with few complaints. There is also strength and grip to the outsole. It should be able to handle most wet conditions and rough terrains with relative ease.
There are some small risks in choosing this Columbia Woodburn II Walking Shoe – but nothing major.
Clearly, there will be some limitations to where you can go with this walking boots. The low-rise cut isn’t great for puddles as water seeps over the top with ease. Some people may also find that there isn’t the same level of ankle support as they might get with a sturdier boot.
Otherwise, the negative comments are quite minor. Some were confused by the size chart while a few had trouble with the lace up closure. A simple change of laces may have been enough here.
What does this all mean for a final recommendation for this Columbia Woodburn II Shoe?
This men’s hiking shoe is proof that you can’t always judge a book by its cover – or a shoe by the shape of its uppers. This isn’t going to work for all hikers and situations.
However, it can hold up to wet conditions and long walks better than you might imagine. There is a good chance that those that normally wear this shape shoe will be able to walk further throughout the year than they did before.
Therefore, it is easy to recommend these Columbia men’s hiking shoes.
Find more reviews about the Columbia Woodburn II Hiking Shoes on Amazon here.
Leave a Reply